This proposal has won the voting!

76%
Development

DeVaultDAO Restructuring

by Decentralizd (5 proposals submitted)

Asked for 1.000 DVT
14
5
  • Approval votes weight
  • 12,599,476.653 DVT
  • Last vote 6 months ago
  • Disapproval votes weight
  • 3,934,126.878 DVT
  • Last vote 6 months ago
  • Ended 5 months ago (10/06/2019 11:56:18pm EDT)
  • Started 6 months ago (09/06/2019 11:56:18pm EDT)

(16,533,603.531 of 813,888.652 required coins voted)

Hide all votes Hide erroneous votes
Voted at Status Type Wallet address Weight
09/14/2019 11:13:17am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qqslud3pawklc7emy4gakeygtynrefjnzs3wmeqna31,965,250.080
synced 5 months ago
09/14/2019 8:24:13am EDTOKNEGATIVEdevault:qzak3y7z0ufrqavy8a4edwdnf6wnnr8j8u8a3utv7m859,376.120
synced 5 months ago
09/09/2019 8:03:08pm EDTERROR!POSITIVEdevault:qzvq7raj7ctv63nw5c46r32ewm2q5jhrxvqzzc0g8y0.000
synced 6 months ago
09/09/2019 6:15:07pm EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qz4k5pfjcrzenn2htc92deagp8t4400y4yuzmjlnd9520,000.000
synced 5 months ago
09/08/2019 6:44:41am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qrtzu8zx7rqcf87ks0ldz8ze204j4ef9tqsmvdjx082,395,999.996
synced 5 months ago
09/08/2019 3:57:54am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qps2cc43tpqzd0lk2rk7542mj2azha5xluzmhu2va073,284.912
synced 5 months ago
09/08/2019 3:56:28am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qrdlmsq622mqwzw0ujk22tu7zqhr4r0swggyulxhv0148,354.359
synced 5 months ago
09/08/2019 3:55:41am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qz0n5gxdc29h3tpwvhycalgt82ywksjgav8v39ws642,240,885.601
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 12:51:36pm EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qzrlg2pa6len5ahxt6vnavdjyt3agqvf0u4anu46mg3,890,914.538
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 10:26:42am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qrv3j8uqepqal9uwmmzajv84vn4gg6mfcckxpw7hvw47,578.857
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 10:26:09am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qzuulludfxr5w0n5svx07rmlz30nlq8yu5acyg95gu0.004
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 10:25:29am EDTERROR!POSITIVEdevault:qpdvgj39yz54rmgdt2uvv2czxfx4u8v4xvagqnzadk0.000
synced 6 months ago
09/07/2019 10:25:05am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qpxpna9sj8x3n7mfnyjdykx942vzhmrqjgsz6a658y122,883.684
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 10:24:38am EDTERROR!POSITIVEdevault:qrlpk8hz70zxj6x6hxppvntgc6d9q7h9hq5052gz440.000
synced 6 months ago
09/07/2019 10:24:10am EDTERROR!POSITIVEdevault:qrr6ctj3uxmhqnesxjn6aqgxep7ma7d2dvlttyy4700.000
synced 6 months ago
09/07/2019 9:41:24am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qp46fk2fp6mspvqcm7heltjx7fslzzh8ncxww0wcfa54,640.703
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 9:40:41am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qptvs25fulft2xd7047emn2xjxm998us556qrd73cw110,339.820
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 9:40:02am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qzjlrd5jgy3f27nvr8a5mmj2ypshtw7hwv32ptvylh354,375.390
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 8:32:41am EDTOKNEGATIVEdevault:qzqqk3gns7qnwrql37urktj8vxz4r9q9ags9r0w209500,000.000
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 8:30:27am EDTOKNEGATIVEdevault:qp2e6lxsgmp0u6cv5wx3aukc8y0gr80lcvvwcwke4x600,000.000
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 8:27:55am EDTOKNEGATIVEdevault:qz4f7z8tey0qx8vy605p0lzwl6hhslpyhsywpdx7ks1,644,794.620
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 8:25:14am EDTOKNEGATIVEdevault:qqh5829lk7hfvu2ql0m43tfv0pxfsv6s350xh2sfzj329,956.138
synced 5 months ago
09/07/2019 8:24:10am EDTERROR!NEGATIVEdevault:qrakgzncec2rfwy9529lwx82v2lmzastyyykck2pyr0.000
synced 6 months ago
09/07/2019 4:39:43am EDTOKPOSITIVEdevault:qql5qsz5uwqke2ycxjqqkegeh99ngqwwf5k602wvfy674,968.709
synced 5 months ago

I propose instead of simply replacing the coordinators of those DAOs, we instead move the tech support aspect to the Web Dev DAO, and then the community, marketing & business development folks into a more General DAO. This will create a more focused environment instead of having understaffed teams relying on 1-2 folks each, which is where we currently are.

Discussion at https://devaultchat.cc/t/devaultdao-restructuring/213

devault:NOTAREALADDYp429u7tedh93vy5te8g65qn5ff2a23

DeVaultDAO Restructuring

In light of recent adjustments in the day-to-day team there has been a few proposals pushed that aim to appoint new coordinators to these DAOs and I feel like while they have their hearts in the right place, it’s going to lead to further discontent and confusion amongst the folks doing all the work currently. Not to mention we could use a consolidation of funds and goals in order to refocus our efforts and start gaining ground in terms of actual business relationships, marketing campaigns & content as well as the day to day task management that is required to run a team of people.

Currently the issue is a mixture of whom is well positioned to not only lead a DAO, but also the goals of these individual DAOs, I propose instead of simply replacing the coordinators of those DAOs, we instead move the tech support aspect to the Web Dev DAO, and then the community, marketing & business development folks into a more General DAO. This will create a more focused environment instead of having understaffed teams relying on 1-2 folks each, which is where we currently are.

I would propose myself to run this DAO, not because other people are not capable but because I am the most invested time wise into this project and am already knee deep in many business relationships as well as working on content creation with 3rd parties and have a good relationship with many folks in the space, as well as a deep understanding of what the role requires not only in terms of the job, but also the day to day expectations of cryptocurrency communities. And I obviously will not be quitting regardless of what happens with this project in the short term…

I would propose this to be the new block % split:
Core Dev: 10%
Web Dev + Tech Support: 10%
General: 10%
Community Budget: Remains 15%
Miners: 55%

I would also propose that this DAO is required to split in half within 6 months as to not grow too large, which reduces our decentralization score as we scale. The suggested block height for this to occur is: 200,000.

I welcome all feedback for this proposal but the purpose is to refocus us as a team as we can all admit that has been a weak point as a community overall lately with this market, while it’s understandable, we need to move forward and keep building if we intend on providing multiple competitive platforms for the world to use.

This proposal would not affect multi sig holders/keys, they would remain the same.Unless they would like to be replaced separately.

Endorsed by

Lexspockpest

Comments